🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social media access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our kids' childhood". Legislation may be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to pass a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a advisory resolution supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful first step," stated the European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, support built behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised concerns. An organization established by the family of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," said a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the state level due to federal inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.